I think it is important to note who is funding any study.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/10/ ... 1513.shtml
An even newer study then this one you have mentioned was recently presented at the American Chemical Society annual meeting. Researchers from Rutgers University tested 11 soft drinks sweetened with high fructose corn syrup and detected high levels of compounds that are normally raised in the blood of people with diabetes - reactive carbonyls. These compounds have been linked to diabetic complications such as tissue damage. Reactive carbonyls were not detected in soda sweetened with sucrose (table sugar).
I used to love Coca-Cola but, when they and the rest of the soft drink industry replaced pure cane syrup with HFCS (primarily to save on production cost because HFCS is much cheaper than cane sugar) I noticed that Coke (and the other sodas) no longer tasted as good. I stopped drinking sodas back then, and now I'm glad I did.
There are enough studies on HFCS, without the bias of being funded by the food and drink industries, that show enough evidence on the problems and dangers with HFCS for me to conclude that it is a substance I would prefer not to ingest.
If Michael truly believes his products are of the finest quality then he should use only the finest ingredients and HFCS is not one of them.
When the time comes for me to open my espresso bar, I will be diligent in buying the finest ingredients and products.
I hope by then, Michael removes HFCS from his products because I'd really like to support a local chocolatier.