crema123
New member
Hello,
There is a building that is more of a destination location - not one that you'd pass driving by and say "oh I'll have a coffee here", and I'm seriously considering it.
There are 2 open locations in the building:
OPTION 1: A ground level location, standard 10-11 ft cielings. Outside shared seating is right next to the location. Easy in / out.
OPTION 2: Upstairs location with beautiful, tremendous, vaulted cielings. Would have to go up stairs to get to the coffee shop, but could take your drinks down to the shared outdoor seating if you wanted.
Given the contrasts - accessibility vs architectural coolness, what are your opinions? Also considering that it's more of a destination location, you wouldn't be "just passing by", but more of a place to go have some good coffee and chill out. (What I'm saying here is this is not a site that Starbucks would look at from a traffic standpoint.)
What are your opinions? Surely someone else has come across a similar dilemma before.
Cheers.
There is a building that is more of a destination location - not one that you'd pass driving by and say "oh I'll have a coffee here", and I'm seriously considering it.
There are 2 open locations in the building:
OPTION 1: A ground level location, standard 10-11 ft cielings. Outside shared seating is right next to the location. Easy in / out.
OPTION 2: Upstairs location with beautiful, tremendous, vaulted cielings. Would have to go up stairs to get to the coffee shop, but could take your drinks down to the shared outdoor seating if you wanted.
Given the contrasts - accessibility vs architectural coolness, what are your opinions? Also considering that it's more of a destination location, you wouldn't be "just passing by", but more of a place to go have some good coffee and chill out. (What I'm saying here is this is not a site that Starbucks would look at from a traffic standpoint.)
What are your opinions? Surely someone else has come across a similar dilemma before.
Cheers.