rcsharpless
New member
- Mar 22, 2014
- 12
- 0
Hi all,
I'm in the process of piecing together a little 5-10lb drum roaster for my fledgling microroasting business. I've read alot of literature on the internet about heating methods for drum roasters and haven't found anything too decisive, so I'd appreciate all the input I can get!
So we know there are three ways of heating coffee in drum roasters: convection, conduction, and radiation. Convection is air-to-bean. Conduction is drum-wall-to-bean (and minimal bean-to-bean). Radiation is direct energy from the heat source (less than 2% of total energy absorbed by the bean). A majority of the information "out there" puts a favorable emphasis on convection, as it is the most even heating method. Conduction is helpful in small amounts, but can be tricky: with coffee beans being round on one side (only one point receives conductive heat), using too much conductive heat can lead to tipping and scorching.
The two primary heating systems I've researched are infrared (like the good old Diedrichs I've worked on) and open atmospheric flame (Probats, etc.). According to Diedrich, infrared allows for more gentle manipulation and faster bean-temp response time... but that would only be the case if you are heating beans through alot of conduction. (We know the reason why atmospheric roasters have slower temp response times... you are essentially waiting for a column of air to heat up/cool off.)
Probat and other atmospheric roasters had to worry about too much conduction also, until someone had the bright idea to put a diffusion plate between the flame and the drum. But it seems like this diffusion plate would then become a secondary conductive heat source, as it would be radiating heat directly to the drum, much like an infrared burner. Aside from producing a large amount of heated air for potential convection, can anyone tell me what would be preferable in an atmospheric system?
Thinking about the radiating heat sources (the Probat diffusion plate and the Diedrich infrared burner), wouldn't both of them play a role in heating the air in-line-of-sight, and thus create an appropriate medium for convection (as air insulates quite well)?
Thanks so much for the input. If you want to follow my roaster construction, I have a forthcoming blog attached to my roasting page: Freytag Coffee Roasters | Microroaster in Austin, TX
I'm in the process of piecing together a little 5-10lb drum roaster for my fledgling microroasting business. I've read alot of literature on the internet about heating methods for drum roasters and haven't found anything too decisive, so I'd appreciate all the input I can get!
So we know there are three ways of heating coffee in drum roasters: convection, conduction, and radiation. Convection is air-to-bean. Conduction is drum-wall-to-bean (and minimal bean-to-bean). Radiation is direct energy from the heat source (less than 2% of total energy absorbed by the bean). A majority of the information "out there" puts a favorable emphasis on convection, as it is the most even heating method. Conduction is helpful in small amounts, but can be tricky: with coffee beans being round on one side (only one point receives conductive heat), using too much conductive heat can lead to tipping and scorching.
The two primary heating systems I've researched are infrared (like the good old Diedrichs I've worked on) and open atmospheric flame (Probats, etc.). According to Diedrich, infrared allows for more gentle manipulation and faster bean-temp response time... but that would only be the case if you are heating beans through alot of conduction. (We know the reason why atmospheric roasters have slower temp response times... you are essentially waiting for a column of air to heat up/cool off.)
Probat and other atmospheric roasters had to worry about too much conduction also, until someone had the bright idea to put a diffusion plate between the flame and the drum. But it seems like this diffusion plate would then become a secondary conductive heat source, as it would be radiating heat directly to the drum, much like an infrared burner. Aside from producing a large amount of heated air for potential convection, can anyone tell me what would be preferable in an atmospheric system?
Thinking about the radiating heat sources (the Probat diffusion plate and the Diedrich infrared burner), wouldn't both of them play a role in heating the air in-line-of-sight, and thus create an appropriate medium for convection (as air insulates quite well)?
Thanks so much for the input. If you want to follow my roaster construction, I have a forthcoming blog attached to my roasting page: Freytag Coffee Roasters | Microroaster in Austin, TX