This is what Starbucks does right. They have tapped into three of the most powerful consumer drivers: fat, sugar and caffeine. If you think about it, there is no physiological reason to drink espresso. There is more caffeine in Folgers, the quantity of espresso is so small that it cannot quench thirst. Normally, people interpret this that espresso is about the experience. That may be part of it, but it is nothing compared to the power of fat and sugar.
Starbucks sells more milk by volume than coffee. Behold the power of cheese.
If you go to the Starbucks site and look up the nutritional information of their espresso based drinks, you'll see stuff that makes McDonalds look like health food. No kidding. Toffee Nut Latte 420 calories.
http://www.starbucks.com/retail/nutriti ... category=1
It is absolute genius. Prey on consumers weakness for fat and sugar, but hide it in a secret language where tall = small. I am in awe.
And no, weeping facial piercings don't quicken my appetite for a great coffee.
All that said, this week I do have a bag of Starbucks espresso blend in my grinder at home. The crema is good. It is nicely balanced and has some nice sweetness from the Indonesian, but it is stale. There is a 9 month sell by window on the packaging (compare to 30 days at Peets) - not surprising because they move it through both Kraft and supermarkets. They have built such a powerful brand that the coffee does not need to be fresh or taste good. Absolutely brilliant.