Reply to Dota
Dota, living in Costa Rica and seeing the coffee farmer situation up close I can well understand your point of view about Starbucks, it is not a unique view by any means and it contains more than a little truth.
But I would say in my opinion that if we have problems with Starbucks behavior as a corporation, I think we are in big trouble because it is hard to go down the roster of major corporations at least here in the US and find one even half as responisble. Even you admit that their treatment of the trade is much superior to the large commercial roasters they are steadily supplanting. But also to throw in my 2 cents on some of your points:
- Quality and use of "fillers" -- I really do believe they buy what most would call "good" coffee...no robustas, no crappy Brazils, no coffees that would otherwise be tendered to NYBOT exchange. Maybe a matter of opinion, one man's filler is another man's...um...varietal (?) but most people I talk to agree that they buy good coffee (despite what happens to that coffee next...). Yes they really jack up the price on the black apron but that is a tiny amount and the farmer is surely happy to get the 1.80...is that coffee really worth $22/lb or is it the marketing? I think the latter so you have to cover the marketing cost, without the marketing there is no black apron. And the farmer can now do his own marketing too with the following year's crop...
- "They don't sell coffee" -- understand what you are saying but bottom line is of course they sell coffee. They also sell "coffee-based drinks" that contains lots of other stuff. This should not bother anybody, if customers want it they sell it. I would too.
- "Obscene profits" I am sorry but you cannot take the cost of the (infitesimal) amount of green bean required for one cup of coffee and divide that into what they get for a latte. Its mathematically and logically incorrect. What about those other ingredients and the cost of running the store? Health care benefits for all employees? The bottom line is, well, the bottom line and here's how Starbucks stacks up in profit margin in their latest fiscal year (net income divided by sales revenue...how much of each dollar in sales is profit, in other words) compared to some other companies:
McDonalds 25%
Pepsi 16%
Procter & Gamble 15%
Tim Horton's 14%
Coca Cola 9%
Starbucks 7%
Kraft 7%
Sara Lee 3%
Unless you believe that they are poor and wasteful, overpaid managers, there really is nothing obscene about it. Check the pharmaceutical companies, now that's obscene!!
- Social Responsibility -- I think they do quite a lot, certainly a lot more than many of the large commercial roasters. Now let's face it, the financial structure of the company allows them to do it -- if green coffee is such a small percentage of your sales, well you can afford to pay 10 cents more per lb, while if you are a traditional roaster selling to supermarkets or offices/hotels/restaurants, that same 10 cents will kill you in the marketplace. But I do think they are concerned about sustainability, where will they get quality coffee in the amounts they need to support their growth, and need for their suppliers to prosper.
No I am not an employee or a supplier or anything to Starbucks, I just believe that for a big company, well, there's lots of worse ones out there.