wearashirt
New member
- Oct 6, 2012
- 3
- 0
I've tasted beans from Figaro, a Kalinga brand, a Cavite brand. While I'm proud that we've coffee farms that supply to various restaurants and outfits (such as Figaro), I've always had low regard for their taste. Compared to Starbucks beans, our local beans are nothing!
Now, of course through some reading I've come to know that we only grow robusta beans which are generally known to have less dynamic flavor than arabica beans. So I guess the only harvester and roaster and distributor of great coffee will forever be Starbucks?
No. I've come to question that, recently.
My mom brought home some beans from a bazaar stall. The stall claimed to have Panama-imported beans which they roast themselves. I pulled a shot, added hot water to to comprise about 30-40% volume of the final americano. Cup assessment: flat. It's as if the beans just came from Cavite.
Next instance: Hawaiian 10% Kona coffee that my girlfriend's ninong brought home from the US state. I pulled a doppio, and made an Americano again. Cup assessment: taste just as dynamic as the Panama shot, but this one has some unique twist to it. Almost like Cavite and Kalinga.
SO, if every other coffee I've tasted from around the world has the same, general level of taste, WHY THE HECK does Starbucks still taste better? So here's my conspiracy theory...STARBUCKS PERFORMS CHEMICAL MODIFICATIONS ON THEIR BEANS. I mean, could they ever supply the whole world with that same, bold-tasting coffee? They could be doing something fishy.
Today, I've come to have some level of respect for our own local beans which do not taste too far from coffees around the world.
Now, of course through some reading I've come to know that we only grow robusta beans which are generally known to have less dynamic flavor than arabica beans. So I guess the only harvester and roaster and distributor of great coffee will forever be Starbucks?
No. I've come to question that, recently.
My mom brought home some beans from a bazaar stall. The stall claimed to have Panama-imported beans which they roast themselves. I pulled a shot, added hot water to to comprise about 30-40% volume of the final americano. Cup assessment: flat. It's as if the beans just came from Cavite.
Next instance: Hawaiian 10% Kona coffee that my girlfriend's ninong brought home from the US state. I pulled a doppio, and made an Americano again. Cup assessment: taste just as dynamic as the Panama shot, but this one has some unique twist to it. Almost like Cavite and Kalinga.
SO, if every other coffee I've tasted from around the world has the same, general level of taste, WHY THE HECK does Starbucks still taste better? So here's my conspiracy theory...STARBUCKS PERFORMS CHEMICAL MODIFICATIONS ON THEIR BEANS. I mean, could they ever supply the whole world with that same, bold-tasting coffee? They could be doing something fishy.
Today, I've come to have some level of respect for our own local beans which do not taste too far from coffees around the world.